2024 Evidence

Was auf diesem Rad steht (94 Optionen)

• Define evidence.
• It is the means, sanctioned by the rules, of ascertaining in a judicial proceeding the truth respecting a matter of fact.
• When did the 2019 Rules on Evidence take effect?
• These are the essential and substantial facts that either form the basis of the primary right and duty or directly make up the wrongful acts or omissions of the defendant.
• These tend to prove or establish the ultimate facts or the premises which conclusions of ultimate facts are based.
• Ultimate facts are also known as _________.
• Evidentiary facts are also known as ______________.
• Give the 3 kinds of evidence as to form.
• This kind of evidence means all physical, tangible items (excluding documents) addressed to the senses of the court.
• It is a kind of evidence which includes written instruments, the contents of which pertain to the fact in issue.
• It is a kind of evidence where expositions are made by the witness.
• It is a kind of evidence where the witness affirms, confirms, and agrees that a fact did or did not occur.
• It is a kind of evidence where the witness testifies that a fact did not exist, that a thing was not done, or that one did not hear.
• It is additional evidence of a different kind and character tending to prove the same point.
• it is additional evidence of the same kind and character tending to prove the same point.
• It is an evidence which, if unexplained or uncontradicted, is sufficient to sustain a judgment in favor of the issue it supports.
• It is any evidence stored or transmitted in a digital or electronic format that a party to a court may use at trial.
• It is an evidence that constitutes the totality of the genetic information.
• It is the recognition of certain facts that judges may properly take and act on without proof because these facts are already known to them.
• Give at least 5 facts where the court takes mandatory judicial notice.
• Give the 3 discretionary judicial notice.
• It is an act, declaration or omission of a a party as to a relevant fact.
• It is the declaration of an accused acknowledging his or her guilt of the offense charged, or of any offense necessarily included therein.
• These are admissions made by parties outside of court or judicial proceedings.
• These are inferences that are thought to be true because the probability that they are true is high.
• These are inferences that the courts treat as facts. These inferences need not be proved.
• This means that a party to a deed and his or her privies are precluded from denying any material fact stated in the deed as against the other party and his or her privies.
• This means that a person who has failed or neglected to assert a right for an unreasonable and unexplained length is presumed to have abandoned the said right.
• These are inferences that the courts use as fact until such a time when it is proved false.
• What does DNA means?
• Give the 2 criteria so that the evidence may be allowed.
• If the evidence has a relation to the fact in issue as to induce belief in its existence or non-existence, the then evidence is __________.
• If there is a relationship between the evidence and the fact in issue, then the evidence is __________.
• If the evidence is not excluded by the law of the rules, then the evidence is ____________.
• It is a kind of evidence that is admitted despite its apparent irrelevance or incompetence on the condition that its relevance or competence will be proved at a later time.
• It is a kind of evidence that is admitted even if it is inadmissible because no timely objection was raised against it.
• Under this rule, photocopies of documents are incompetent as evidence because they are not originals.
• Who is your instructor in Evidence?
• Who is your instructor in Evidence?
• Who is your instructor in Evidence?
• It is the medium or means by which a fact is proved or disproved.
• It is the probative effect of evidence.
• Give the 2 requisites for admissibility of evidence.
• It proves a fact without the need to make an inference from another fact.
• It proves a fact in issue indirectly through an inference which the fact finder draws from the evidence established.
• What are the requirements in order for the circumstantial evidence will be sufficient for conviction?
• It exists when the witness states that an event did not occur or that the state of facts alleged to exist does not actually exist.
• It exists when the witness affirms in the stand that a certain state of facts does not exist or that a certain event happened.
• It is an evidence that is not excluded by law in a particular case.
• These are inferences of the existence or non-existence of a fact which courts are permitted to draw from the proof of other facts.
• These are presumptions which are irrebutable and any evidence tending to rebut the presumption is not admissible.
• They are those which are satisfactory if uncontradicted, but may be contradicted and overcome by other evidence.
• It states that where a person who, by force of circumstances is under a duty to another to speak, refrains from doing so and thereby leads the other to believe in the existence of a state of facts in reliance on which he acts to his prejudice.
• It states that whenever a party has, by his own declaration, act or omission, intentionally led another to believe a particular thing to be true, and to act upon such belief, he cannot, in any litigation arising out of such declaration, act or omission, be permitted to falsify it.
• It is unreasonable delay to seek or to enforce a right at a proper time.
• It is a doctrine in international law which states that the party who wants to have a foreign law applied to a dispute or case has the burden of proving the foreign law.
• What are the requisites for admissibility of object evidence?
• It is the process of proving the due execution and genuineness of a document.
• It provides that when the subject of the inquiry is the contents of the document, no evidence shall be admissible other than the original document itself.
• It refers to evidence other than the original instrument or document itself.
• It is the class of evidence that is relevant to the fact in issue, it being first sown that the primary evidence of the fact is not obtainable.
• It states that when cross-examination cannot be done or completed due to causes attributable to a party who offered the witness, the incomplete testimony is rendered incompetent and should be stricken from the record.
• It is a kind of admission which does not require proof and may be contradicted only by showing that it was made through palpable mistake or that the imputed admission was not, in fact made.
• This admission occurs when a person manifests his assent to the statement of another person.
• It states that extrajudicial confessions independently made without collusion which are identical with each other in their essential details and corroborated by other evidence against the persons implicated, are admissible to show the probability of the latter’s actual participation in the commission of the crime.
• It is a kind of objection to evidence wherein it states that the evidence being presented is not relevant to the issue.
• It is a kind of objection to evidence wherein it states that the evidence is excluded by law or rules.
• It is the fact or proposition to be established.
• It is the fact to be proved, the fact which is in issue and to which the evidence is directed.
• It is the probative or evidentiary fact tending to prove the fact in issue.
• It means that the evidence must have such a relation to the fact in issue as to induce belief in its existence or non-existence.
• It is the weight, credit, and aggregate evidence on either side and is usually considered to be synonymous with the term “greater weight of the evidence” or “greater weight of the credible evidence”.
• It means probability of the truth, evidence which is more convincing to the court as worthy of belief than that which is offered in opposition thereto.
• It is that degree of evidence that produces in the mind of the trier of fact a firm belief or conviction as to allegations sought to be established.
• It states that where the evidence is relevant and competent for two or more purposes, such evidence should be admitted for any or all purposes for which it is offered provided it satisfies all the requirements of law for its admissibility therefor.
• It states that where the evidence at the time of its offer appears to be immaterial or irrelevant unless it is connected with the other facts to be subsequently proved, such evidence may be received on condition that the other facts will be proved thereafter, otherwise the evidence already given will be stricken out.
• It allows a party to introduce otherwise inadmissible evidence to answer the opposing party’s previous introduction of inadmissible evidence if it would remove any unfair prejudice caused by the admission of the earlier inadmissible evidence.
• It is the probative value given by the court to particular evidence admitted to prove a fact in issue.
• It refers to the questions of whether or not the evidence proves an issue.
• It is the cognizance of certain facts which judges may properly take and act upon without proof because they are supposed to be known to them.
• It is that logical necessity which rests upon a party at any particular time during the trial to create a prima facie case in his favor or to overthrow one created against him.
• It traditionally refers to the obligation of a party to the litigation to persuade the court that he is entitled to relief.
• It is a rule in evidence which restricts cross-examination to facts and circumstances which are connected with the matters that have been stated in the direct examination of the witness.
• It is a rule cross examination where a witness is called to testify to a particular fact, he becomes a witness for all purposes and may be fully cross-examined upon all matters material to the issue, the examination not being confined to the matters inquired about in the direct examination.
• It happens when an attorney is not allowed by the court to present testimony which he thinks is competent, material and necessary to prove his case, thus, he must make an offer of proof.
• It is one which assumes as true a fact not yet testified to by the witness, or contrary to that which he has previously stated.
• It is a technique employed usually as part of cross-examination to discredit a witness by attacking his credibility.
• It is an evidence which is standing alone unexplained or uncontradicted, is sufficient to maintain its proposition affirmed.
• He/she is the party who owns or who called the witness to testify in his favor.
• He/she is the party against whom the witness is called.
• It is a solemn and formal declaration that the witness will be truthful.
• Who is your instructor in Evidence?
• Who is your instructor in Evidence?
• Who is your instructor in Evidence?